SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES OF PREDATOR AVOIDANCE: EXPERIMENTS WITH FISH AND SNAILS

By Andrew M. Turner, Sharon L. Montgomery. 2003

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96c9279832496b005c34ef371f24f2efe02734ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Alan P. Covich
2. Andrew M. Turner
3. Mark I. McCormick
4. R. Manassa

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Alan P. Covich
2. Simon Rundle
3. Andrew M. Turner
4. Mark I. McCormick
5. R. Manassa
6. M. Pratchett
7. P. Munday
8. Geoffrey P. Jones

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Alan P. Covich
2. Sarah E. Turner
3. Heidi M. Lappi
4. Andrew M. Turner
5. Mark I. McCormick
6. R. Manassa

Citations in the corpus

• Learning, memory and predator avoidance by freshwater snails: effects of experience on predator recognition and defensive strategy (2006, background): “Field studies confirm that Physa habitat use depends on the sort of predators present in a lake, and that the presence of fish or crayfish can induce such shifts in a natural setting (Turner et al. 2000; Bernot & Turner 2001; Turner & Montgomery 2003).”
• Predation risk assessment by olfactory and visual cues in a coral reef fish (2008, background): “Chemical cues may remain well after a predator has left the vicinity and a reliance on chemical information may lead to an overestimate of risk ( Turner and Montgomery 2003 ).”
• Cue association and antipredator behaviour in a pulmonate snail, Lymnaea stagnalis (2006, background): “…of cues either takes the form of the predator feeding on conspecifics (Crowl & Covich 1990; Loose & Dawidowicz 1994; Sih & McCarthy 2002; Turner & Montgomery 2003; Jacobsen & Stabell 2004) or predator cues paired with crushed conspecific, thought to simulate a predation event (Turner…”
• Winning the biodiversity arms race among freshwater gastropods: competition and coexistence through shell variability and predator avoidance (2010, background): “…assemblages of gastropods with different shell characteristics are distributed across a wide range of temporal and spatial scales that illustrate dispersal and predator–prey dynamics (Lassen, 1975; Brönmark, 1985; Lodge et al., 1987; Økland, 1990; Carlsson, 2000; Turner & Montgomery, 2003, 2009).”