New public management

By J. Lane. 2000

1,198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a269cbfc95e17e2278067249c3661a4b75b90db1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Administration

1. Josh Ryan‐Collins
2. Carla Marisa Bonina
3. Vicente Pina
4. Antonio Cordella
5. Sonia Royo
6. Ana Yetano
7. Mariana Mazzucato
8. C. Pollitt

Citations in the corpus

• CLARIFYING CONVERGENCE. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform (2001, background): “Many authors offer de nitions and few are identical (e.g. Hood 1991; Ferlie et al. 1996; Lane 2000).”
• A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection (2012, background): “Positions of scholars differ in identifying NPM as a new paradigm in public administration (see for instance Barzelay, 2001; Gruening, 2001; Lynn, 1997), or as a specific governance strategy (Lane, 2000; Sørensen and Löfgren, 2007).”