Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and developing Countries
By Ian J. Bateman, K. Willis. 2001
657 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a268cb0783e0e251ee2d80f904c55e632a1f0886
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Tran Huu Tuan
- G. Atkinson
- S. Navrud
- S. Mourato
- Fikret Adaman
- Nihan Karali
- Craig A. Bond
- Gürkan Kumbaroglu
Citations in the corpus
- Willingness to pay for eco-labelled wood furniture: Choice-based conjoint analysis versus open-ended contingent valuation (2007, background): “CA estimates (£108 or 1Resource economists developed CV in attempts at pricing non-market, public goods (Randall et al., 1974; Cummings et al., 1986; Mitchell and Carson, 1989; Bateman and Willis, 1999).”
- The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs (2008, methodology): “The parametric linear-logistic result (e.g. Hanemann and Kanninen 1999) is slightly higher, namely e105 per household per year with a 95% confidence interval between e75–135.”
- Consumer Preferences for Locally Made Specialty Food Products Across Northern New England (2005, methodology): “In this study, we examine two specifications, both of which assume a non-negative willingness to pay for the local attribute, constrained to be less than income (Hanemann and Kanninen 1999).”