Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies

By Erln Siiic. Agroforestry Systems, 2003

537 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a24e749682cc939b584b71aaf8c69781861f42b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Adoption of Climate-Smart Agriculture Technologies in Tanzania (2020, background): “This is consistent with conventional wisdom on the primary barriers to agroforestry (Pattanayak et al., 2003) and is typically related to the extended period of time necessary to reap benefits from trees.”
Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia (2009, background): “Research on adoption of agricultural technologies indicates that there is a positive relationship between the level of adoption and the availability of credit (Yirga, 2007; Pattanayak et al., 2003).”
Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review (2012, background): “Omission of variables should not be viewed as an implication of their irrelevance (Pattanayak et al. 2003); for example, the impact of income on ICS adoption may be misunderstood if access to credit is not considered.”
Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America (2005, background): “size variable found it to be positively correlated with adoption in 50% of cases, but negatively correlated in 28% of cases (Pattanayak et al., 2003).”
Can carbon sequestration markets benefit low-income producers in semi-arid Africa? Potentials and challenges (2007, background): “Land tenure security has been shown to have a positive effect on the adoption of improved management practices, as illustrated by a review of agroforestry adoption in Africa (Pattanayak et al., 2003).”
Factors influencing the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: a review for policy implications (2012, background): “Some of these findings have been reviewed, e.g. Pattanayak et al. (2003) and Mercer (2004) on agroforestry innovations; Fleming and Vanclay (2010) on climate change adoptive measures, and Knowler and Bradshaw (2007) on conservation practices.”
Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua (2007, background): “Credit has been found to increase adoption of agroforestry practices, and its role is very often significant (Pattanayak et al., 2003).”
Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua (2008, background): “…often usually found a positive effect, though rarely a significant one and have generally attributed it to experience reducing the risk of adoption (Pattanayak et al., 2003); perhaps the negative effect we find is due to older farmers being less willing to make changes.19 Male-headed households…”
Adoption and continued use of improved maize seeds: Case study of Central Ethiopia (2010, result): “Credit access has mostly been reported to have a similar result in earlier research (see Pattanayak et al., 2003 for a summary).”
Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies: limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement (2006, background): “One recent study that used meta-analysis to examine agricultural technology issues (Pattanayak et al., 2003) analyzed 32 studies of the adoption of agro-forestry practices.”