FLOOD DAMAGE, VULNERABILITY AND RISK PERCEPTION – CHALLENGES FOR FLOOD DAMAGE RESEARCH

By F. Messner, Volker Meyer. 2006

548 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a23fe00796ed2ed3b0cc1109c8fcdf4b32806a50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Iuliana Armas
2. Eugen Avram

In Global and Planetary Change

1. A. Scolobig
2. Iuliana Armas
3. Eugen Avram

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Iuliana Armas
2. Eugen Avram

Citations in the corpus

• Perception of flood risk in Danube Delta, Romania (2009, result): “The topic of flood risk in related perception is of considerable interest, as some recently published papers have proven ( Messner and Meyer 2005, 2006; Raaijmakers et al. 2008).”
• Integrating Multiple Perspectives in Social Multicriteria Evaluation of Flood-Mitigation Alternatives: The Case of Malborghetto-Valbruna (2008, background): “There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that successful decisions about floodplain management issues require the participation of all the social actors (Bana et al., 2004; De Bruijn, 2005; Fordham, 2000; Haque et al., 2002; Messner and Meyer 2006; Pearce, 2003).”
• Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods executive summary (2007, unknown): “Although the terminology differs occasionally, flood damages are mostly categorised firstly in direct and indirect damages and secondly in tangible and intangible damages (Smith & Ward 1998; Parker et al. 1987; Penning-Rowsell et al. 2003; Messner & Meyer 2005).”