Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods executive summary
By Volker Meyer, F. Messner, E. Penning‐Rowsell, C. Green, S. Tunstall, A. Veen, S. Tapsell, T. Wilson, J. Krywkow, C. Logtmeijer and 4 more. 2007
236 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea944d8fc47d9c165f5ead5d7e78cdc57d51a331
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. Strong
- Volker Meyer
- Travis Kraus
- N. Becker
- Haoyi Xiong
- A. Thieken
- V. Markantonis
- L. Bouwer
Citations in the corpus
- Review article: assessing the costs of natural hazards - state of the art and knowledge gaps (2013, background): “Such data are often available only at a highly aggregated level (Messner et al., 2007).”
- Flood recovery and property acquisition in Cedar Rapids, Iowa (2016, background): “Central modeling questions in this process are how many and which return periods should be applied for estimating flood risk? Messner et al. (2007) suggest that a model with six flood return periods is preferred.”
- Mathematical modeling of flooding due to river bank failure (2013, background): “The study of flooding events resulting from bank overflooding and levee breaching is of relevant social and environmental interest because flood waves, resulting from levee failure, might cause loss of lives [1] and the destruction of properties and ecosystems [2].”