Sustained division of the attentional spotlight
By M. Müller, Manish Kumar Dwivedi, T. Gruber, S. Hillyard. Nature, 2003
413 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2346122f8734bd2b465ad222a2d3c8ad9fb875c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Brendan Z. Allison
- Wolfgang Klimesch
- Simon Hanslmayr
- E. Wolpaw
- Paul Sauseng
- Jonathan R. Wolpaw
- A. Bánki
- E. Ward
Citations in the corpus
- EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. (2007, background): “It should also be noted that increases in SSVEP power were also found in other frequencies (e.g., Hillyard et al., 1997; Müller et al., 2003; Ding et al., 2006).”
- Brain–computer interface systems: progress and prospects (2007, background): “Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) reflect attention to a rapidly oscillating stimulus [63,64] .”
- A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIs (2010, positive): “Furthermore, the user can be distracted, which can deteriorate the signal because the SSVEP strength is strongly influenced by attention [69].”
- Rhythmic visual stimulation as a window into early brain development: A systematic review (2023, methodology): “A series of studies have also investigated attentional phenomena using RVS, testing how much overt and covert attention a certain stimulus received, as indexed by the RVS response (Martens et al., 2011; Müller et al., 2003, frequency tagging, see Fig.”