University researchers working with private companies
By Paul Craig Boardman, Branco Leonidov Ponomariov. 2009
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a22a06c689488c1f85427a8652ea2b7c0e7cf9bc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Federica Rossi
- I. B. Freitas
- Victor A. Gilsing
- Andrew K. Munro
- M. Steen
- Aldo Geuna
- Dieter Franz Kogler
- Massimiliano Vesci
In Statistics and Probability
- Victor A. Gilsing
- I. B. Freitas
- Aldo Geuna
- Gabriela Dutrenit
- Federica Rossi
- Ainurul Rosli
- C. Fuentes
- Ben R. Martin
In Strategy and Management
- I. B. Freitas
- Dieter Franz Kogler
- Federica Rossi
- Victor A. Gilsing
- Andrew K. Munro
- Aldo Geuna
- Massimiliano Vesci
- Roberto Parente
Citations in the corpus
- Industry Funding of University Research and Scientific Productivity (2011, unknown): “Boardman and Ponomariov (2009) study the effects of industry grants on a broad set of indictors.”
- Indicators of university–industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: evidence from the United Kingdom (2015, background): “…of entrepreneurs and industry personnel in universities, visiting scholarships, and others; overviews of the many channels of knowledge exchange are presented in Dutrénit et al., 2010; Hughes et al., 2011; Boardman and Ponomariov, 2009; Jensen, R. et al, 2010; Bekkers and Bodas Freitas, 2008).”
- Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers (2011, background): “Although various studies have demonstrated that policy may contribute to improving knowledge exchange between academia and industry (Rasmussen, 2008; Bercovitz and Feldman, 2006; Peneder, 2008; Krabel and Mueller, 2009), there have also been concerns that such policies may ignore the presumed divers”
- Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions (2013, background): “9 are considered together with consulting activities (Boardman and Ponomariov, 2009; Giuliani et al, 2010) and sometimes also with contract research (D’Este and Patel, 2007).”
- Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit (2012, background): “This result confirms those by Boardman and Ponomariov (2009), as they argue that researchers in centers are more eager to interact than are researchers from universities.”
- A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development (2010, background): “…inventor, the management team, and the venture capitalist, might be guided by different motivations, which – in the worst case – may be conflicting (Boardman and Ponomariov, 2009), thus limiting the chances that these businesses will succeed beyond the initial start-up phase (McAdam and…”
- The Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Researchers: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with the Triple Helix Model (2019, background): “…perform a large share of university research (Enders 2002) and show a marked orientation toward industry (Bienkowska, Klofsten, and Rasmussen 2016; Boardman and Ponomariov 2009), and thus are potential academic entrepreneurs and natural channels for the effective implementation of the knowledge…”
- Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: new insights for academic based research (2013, unknown): “…scientific productivity became widespread (e.g., Breschi and Catalini 2010; Branco et al. 2010; Cruz-Castro and Sanz-Menéndez 2010; Evans 2010; Defazio et al. 2009; Boardman and Ponomariov 2009; Heinze et al. 2009), informing the policies created to foster universities’ contribution to society.”