The Income Component of the Human Development Index

By S. Anand, Amartya Sen. 2000

495 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a22046b51be498a44f01610c1d668a0bb2e4ca0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Inequality, Interactions, and Human Development (2009, background): “Despite a few modifications (Anand and Sen, 2000) that were introduced after its inception, the basic framework has remained the same.”
Measuring Non-Economic Well-Being Achievement (2005, background): “Anand and Sen (2000) provide a detailed discussion of this issue in the context of the HDI.”
The HDI 2010: new controversies, old critiques (2011, methodology): “ 9 Anand and Sen (2000).”
Multidimensional Measures of Well-Being: Standard of Living and Quality of Life Across Countries (2007, background): “As Anand and Sen (2000) themselves argue, income can be an indirect indicator of some capabilities.”
Robust human development rankings (2008, unknown): “Thus income continues to be an important yardstick since it is indicative of a person s command over resources (Anand and Sen, 2000) but has been complemented by numerous other indicators.”
The Global Distribution of Income (2014, background): “They posited a “world social welfare function,” which exhibits a changing social marginal valuation of income at different points along the global income distribution (see also Anand and Sen, 2000).”
On Weighting the Components of the Human Development Index: A Statistical Justification (2011, methodology): “It does not take into account other dimensions of well-being, such as security, political participation and human rights (Anand and Sen, 1992, 2000; Ranis et al., 2006), or the distribution of human development within a country (Sagar and Najam, 1998, 1999; Grimm et al. 2008).1 Another criticism of…”
Development as Happiness: The Subjective Perception of Happiness and UNDP’s Analysis of Poverty, Wealth and Development (2009, background): “This theoretical backbone of UNDP seeks ‘‘to put people back into the centre of development’’ (UNDP quoted in Hicks, 1997, p. 1283) recognizing that human beings are the primary ends as well as principal means of development ( Anand and Sen 2000, p. 83 ).”
HOW SHOULD WE MEASURE THE “ECONOMIC” ASPECTS OF WELL‐BEING? (2005, background): “…Development Index to be motivated by the idea that life in itself is valuable , and that education is valuable partly because it increases the human capability to lead a life of understanding and meaning—i . e . greater knowledge is in itself an aspect of a good life ( see Anand and Sen , 2000 ) .”