HOW SHOULD WE MEASURE THE “ECONOMIC” ASPECTS OF WELL‐BEING?

By L. Osberg, Andrew Sharpe. 2005

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/525707d1b9e09d8110eb094075ac8ab7efd281de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. M. Kovačević

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. M. Kovačević

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Kovačević

Citations in the corpus

• Review of HDI Critiques and Potential Improvements (2010, background): “Osberg and Sharpe (2005) have suggested using the Index of Economic Wellbeing (IEWB) 13 in place of GDP, as a more complete index of command over resources.”
• The Economic Security Index: A New Measure for Research and Policy Analysis (2012, unknown): “By adopting a “named-risk” approach (Osberg and Sharpe 2005), these approaches also essentially fix the roster of economic risks at a point in time (as well as assume this roster is the same across different subgroups), rather than allowing a changing mix of risks to household finances to be…”