How Behavioral Economics Trims Its Sails and Why
By Ryan Bubb, R. Pildes. 2014
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a21e1e1c0b193144cf81756a1fd0f97d0ad2a8b8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- N. Chater
- George Loewenstein
- Jordan Litman
- Paul J Silvia
- Paul Slovic
- T. Kashdan
- Emily M. Grossnickle
- Colin F. Camerer
Citations in the corpus
- A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost (2018, unknown): “Insofar as they steer people in certain directions without imposing significant costs, tools of this kind are called “nudges”; there is a lively and continuing debate about their use (Bubb & Pildes 2014; Conley 2012; Halpern 2015).”
- Putting nudges in perspective (2017, background): “…may have had the unintended effect of encouraging policy makers to channel behavioural economics into a narrower range of policy problems than it has the potential to address, and focus on a narrower range of policy solutions than it has the potential to provide (see also Bubb & Pildes, 2014).”