Putting nudges in perspective

By George Loewenstein, N. Chater. Behavioural Public Policy, 2017

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Review of Nudges: Definitions, Justifications, Effectiveness (2020, unknown): “According to some scholars (e.g., Banerjee & John, 2021; Bhargava & Loewenstein, 2015; Loewenstein & Chater, 2017), in fact, nudges can be used to enhance the design and effectiveness of standard policies, and vice versa, resulting in what are termed “hybrid” (Loewenstein & Chater, 2017) or…”
Requiem for a Nudge: Framing effects in nudging honesty (2020, unknown): “Instead, one needs more than just a gentle nudge – for example a shove – to achieve actual behavioral change (e.g., Kahan, 20 0 0; Oliver, 2015; Grüne-Yanoff and Hertwig, 2016; Loewenstein and Chater, 2017; Ariely, 2019 ).”
Moving beyond the obsession with nudging individual behaviour: Towards a broader understanding of Behavioural Public Policy (2020, background): “However, it will also argue that the vehement criticism of nudging will not disappear just because a behavioural lens is applied more frequently to the standard approaches of public policy and administration (Loewenstein and Chater, 2017; Moynihan, 2018).”