Communication in crested tits and the risk of predation

By I. Krams. 2001

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1d9cc0830f6e5e928826202990e0b0c88550f43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. S. Lima
2. Tatjana Krama
3. G. Boncoraglio
4. N. Saino
5. W. Cresswell
6. Johan Lind
7. D. Gil
8. Diego Llusia

In Ecology

1. S. Lima
2. Tatjana Krama
3. W. Cresswell
4. Diego Llusia
5. Johan Lind
6. D. Gil
7. G. Boncoraglio
8. N. Saino

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. S. Lima
2. W. Cresswell
3. Tatjana Krama
4. Johan Lind
5. Diego Llusia
6. D. Gil
7. N. Saino
8. G. Boncoraglio

Citations in the corpus

• Mobbing behaviour in birds: costs and reciprocity based cooperation (2007, background): “We recorded whether it gave any alarm calls and also the duration of calling since this can increase the risk of predation (Krams 2001a).”
• Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation (2009, background): “, KRAMS, I., & IGAUNE, K. (2008). Effects of cover on loud trill-call and soft seet-call use in the crested tit (Parus cristatus). Ethology 114, 656–661. KRAMS, I. (2001a). Communication in created tits and the risk of predation. Animal Behaviour 61, 1065–1068. KRAMS, I. (2001b). Perch selection by ”
• Cost of mobbing call to breeding pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca (2005, background): “Because mobbing calls can eventually attract other prey, they probably can also attract other predators, especially acoustically oriented ones (Klump and Shalter, 1984; Krams, 2001; Latimer, 1977; Ryan et al., 1982; Shalter, 1978; Yasukawa, 1989).”
• Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior (2005, background): “…has also been done on the hunting preferences of bats to determine the vulnerability of calling frogs (e.g., Tuttle and Ryan, 1982), and a recent playback study provides empirical evidence of increased predation risk associated with contact calling in crested tits Parus cristatus (Krams, 2001).”
• The Bird Dawn Chorus Revisited (2020, background): “This is regrettable because experiments have shown that predators do use acoustic signals to locate prey in a variety of taxa (Haskell 1994; Krams 2001; Zuk and Kolluru 1998), influencing the evolution of singing behaviour (e.g. Tuttle and Ryan 1981).”
• Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis (2007, background): “…songs in densely vegetated habitats, or otherwise for frequency-unmodulated songs in open habitats, if the species/population under scrutiny is exposed to intense predation by predators that rely on hearing to locate their prey (Yasukawa 1989; Mouget & Bretagnolle 2000; Krams 2001; Hale 2004).”