A psychometric re-assessment of the COPE questionnaire

By K. Lyne, D. Roger. 2000

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1d211ac2ffa7f0668f74b48ebcd79c9585792f6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Motives for the social sharing of an emotional experience (2015, background): “Two items had high skewness (greater than 3.0) and kurtosis (greater than 7.0) and were thus eliminated, as highly skewed items can significantly bias the results of factor analyses (Lyne & Roger, 2000).”
A Systematic Review of Studies Using the Brief COPE: Religious Coping in Factor Analyses (2011, methodology): “Other researchers have since reported a three-factor structure [9,12,13], or modified the questionnaire and proposed a five-factor structure [14].”
A multi-method examination of the effects of mindfulness on stress attribution, coping, and emotional well-being (2009, methodology): “As in past research (e.g., Deisinger et al., 1996; Lyne & Roger, 2000; Stowell et al., 2001), the three subscales comprising each type of coping were averaged to form composite approach and avoidant scales (a = 0.82 and 0.86, respectively).”
Cognitive-Social Sources of Wellbeing: Differentiating the Roles of Coping Style, Social Support and Emotional Intelligence (2016, methodology): “Studies using the MSCEIT have produced mixed outcomes, but there is a trend towards EI relating to a broadly adaptive style of coping, characterized by higher problem-focus, and lower emotion-focus and avoidance (MacCann et al. 2011; Matthews et al. 2006). In studies of adolescents, Peters et al. (2”
Predicting hopelessness and psychological distress: The role of perfectionism and coping. (2003, methodology): “We used oblique rotation (oblimin) because coping research suggests that the scales are correlated (Carver et al., 1989; Ingledew et al., 1996; Lyne & Roger, 2000 ).”