Values in action scale and the Big 5: An empirical indication of structure

By Craig Macdonald, Miles Bore, D. Munro. 2008

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Virtuous states and virtuous traits: How the empirical evidence regarding the existence of broad traits saves virtue ethics from the situationist critique (2014, background): “Furthermore, recent research has found small and moderate relationships between self-reported moral behavior and social desirability (that is, the tendency to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others) as well as between self-reported virtuousness and social desirability (”
Character strengths and wellbeing in adolescence: Structure and correlates of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Children (2012, methodology): “, 2010), four-factor (Brdar & Kashdan, 2010; Macdonald et al., 2008), and five-factor solutions (Peterson et al.”
Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates (2010, methodology): “More studies are needed to address the replicability, stability, and meaningfulness of four factor (current study and Macdonald et al., 2008) and five factor (Peterson et al., 2008) models using samples from varied cultures across time.”
Factor Structure of the Chinese Virtues Questionnaire (2012, result): “In fact, inconsistent results 1 Southwest University, Beibei District, Chongqing, China 2 City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong 3 Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China Corresponding Author: Samuel M.Y. Ho, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong Email: munyinho@cityu.”