Tests on Stub Columns of Concrete-filled RHS Sections

409 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Developments and advanced applications of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) structures: Members (2014, background): “A confinement factor (ξ) thus had been introduced to describe this effect [2,15]:”
Structural design of stainless steel concrete filled columns (2008, methodology): “Notable early studies were reported by Rasmussen and Hancock [26, 27] and Talja and Salmi [28], who investigated the compressive and flexural response of stainless steel hollow sections, whilst a series of more recent investigations have now been performed [29, 30, 31, 32, 33].”
Analytical model for predicting axial capacity and behavior of concrete encased steel composite stub columns (2006, background): “Research has been conducted to study the confinement effect of the concrete in concrete-filled steel tube (CFT) composite columns [11–16].”
Performance-based analysis of concrete-filled steel tubular beam–columns, Part I: Theory and algorithms (2009, background): “Han [9] conducted tests to study the effects of constraining factors and width-tothickness ratios on the performance of rectangular CFST columns.”
Behavior of Steel Tube and Confined High Strength Concrete for Concrete-Filled RHS Tubes (2005, methodology): “Han (2001) studied eight square and eight rectangular composite columns with H/t or B/t ratios ranging from 31 to 42, and L/H ratio of 3.”