Structural design of stainless steel concrete filled columns
By D. Lam, L. Gardner. 2008
317 citations recorded by the source corpus.
a b s t r a c t This paper presents the behaviour and design of axially loaded concrete filled stainless steel circular and square hollow sections. The experimental investigation was conducted using different concrete cube strengths varied from 30 to 100 MPa. The column strengths and load-axial shortening curves were evaluated. The study is limited to cross-section capacity and has not been validated at member level. Comparisons of the tests results together with other available results from the literature have been made with existing design methods for composite carbon steel sections — Eurocode 4 and ACI. It was found that existing design guidance for carbon steel may generally be safely applied to concrete filled stainless steel tubes, though it tends to be over-conservative. A continuous strength method is proposed and it is found to provide the most accurate and consistent prediction of the axial capacity of the composite concrete filled stainless steel hollow sections due largely to the more precise assessment of the contribution of the stainless steel tube to the composite resistance.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8a5c50ea8d66bb7a65f7cc7c385c3de3e668042
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Civil and Structural Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Compressive testing and numerical modelling of concrete-filled double skin CHS with austenitic stainless steel outer tubes (2019, background): “The behaviour and load-bearing capacity of 68 concrete-filled stainless steel columns have also been studied [18-22].”
- The continuous strength method for the design of circular hollow sections (2016, background): “The dataset includes stub column test results for hot-finished structural steel [23–27], very high strength structural steel [28, 29], cold-formed structural steel [25, 26, 28, 30–47], austenitic stainless steel [48–57], duplex stainless steel [51, 58, 59], ferritic stainless steel [60] and alu90”