More Taxonomy, Not DNA Barcoding

By M. Ebach, Craig Holdrege. 2005

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0f4cc12b41b5291af761baf89b4d4d9af48bb9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Motomi Ito
2. Toshihide Kato
3. Utsugi Jinbo
4. F. Jones
5. Florian Leese
6. Vasco Elbrecht

In Genetics

1. Motomi Ito
2. Toshihide Kato
3. Utsugi Jinbo
4. F. Jones

In Molecular Biology

1. Motomi Ito
2. Toshihide Kato
3. Utsugi Jinbo
4. F. Jones

Citations in the corpus

• Current progress in DNA barcoding and future implications for entomology (2011, background): “Some taxonomists are concerned that DNA barcoding will compete with traditional taxonomic studies (e.g. Ebach & Holdrege 2005a,b).”
• Taxonomic sufficiency: The influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates (2008, background): “…arguments include: that biologists do not agree on the definition or ecological significance of species (Kaesler and Herricks 1980; Hynes 1984; Ebach and Holdrege 2005a, 2005b; Fitzhugh 2005; Holdrege and Ebach 2006; Kunz 2006); that many species remain undescribed, so their identification is…”