Sources of background noise and their influence on vertebrate acoustic communication
By David A. Luther, Katherine E. Gentry. 2013
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0e68eb8cd8dd6cdbdd5e70a61e47314ad578879
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Citations in the corpus
- Not so sexy in the city: urban birds adjust songs to noise but compromise vocal performance (2016, unknown): “In the context of urban noise, researchers have focused primarily on trill length in terms of repetition for increased signal detection (Brumm and Slabbekoorn 2005; Luther and Gentry 2013).”
- Acoustic communication in a noisy world: can fish compete with anthropogenic noise? (2014, background): “…quiet environment; as with most animals that communicate acoustically, they face the problem of naturally occurring, potentially masking, noise arising from abiotic sources including wind, rain, and waves and biotic noise from chorusing conspecifics or heterospecifics (see Luther and Gentry 2013).”
- The evolution of animal communication (2013, background): “We include review articles addressing constraints in communication (Diep & Westneat, 2013; Luther & Gentry, 2013; Naguib, 2013; Price, 2013; Wiley, 2013b), as well as articles with original data on the coding and decoding of information on motiva- tion and aggression (Ballentine et al., 2013; Hyman…”