Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems

470 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews? (2011, background): “…category and the nearest L1 speech category to shift away from one another in phonetic space, but while there is evidence that this operates for the production of consonants, Flege has expressed doubts that phonetic category dissimilation is evident in the production of vowels (Flege et al. 2003).”
Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean (2006, background): “See Flege et al. (1995) and Flege et al. (2003) for further discussion of ‘Age of Arrival ’ or ‘Age of Learning’ effects. particular vowel, it successfully captures amore general sense of the vowel’s pitch in relation to (a) the other two vowels in the same target word and (b) corresponding…”
Production of coronal stops by simultaneous bilingual adults (2006, background): “(Grosjean, 1989; Best, 1995; Flege et al., 2003 ), the idea of interactions between the languages of simultaneous bilinguals is fairly new.”
Automatic speech recognition and speech variability: A review (2007, background): “This is due to the fact that non-native speakers can replace an unfamiliar phoneme in the target language, which is absent in their native language phoneme inventory, with the sound considered as the closest in their native language phoneme inventory (Flege et al., 2003).”