Development on whose terms?: CSR discourse and social realities in Papua New Guinea's extractive industries sector

By E. Gilberthorpe, Glenn Banks. 2012

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0c183ffca2ab44830880382f014f7530b300fc6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. E. Papyrakis
2. E. Gilberthorpe
3. Atsushi Iimi

In Business and International Management

1. E. Papyrakis

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. Papyrakis
2. E. Gilberthorpe
3. Shuai Shao
4. Lili Yang
5. J. Weber
6. A. James
7. J. Emery
8. J. Boyce

Citations in the corpus

• The extractive industries and development: The resource curse at the micro, meso and macro levels (2015, background): “Anthropologists Benson and Kirsch, for example, argue that a rhetoric of ‘sustainability’ is employed to benefit the corporate sector over and above local communities (Benson and Kirsch, 2010; also Kirsch, 2010; Gilberthorpe and Banks, 2012; O’Faircheallaigh and Ali, 2008).”
• The Resource Curse - What Have We Learned from Two Decades of Intensive Research: Introduction to the Special Issue (2017, background): “…of these studies critique the tendency of extractive multinational companies to use the rhetoric of ‘sustainability’ and ‘corporate social responsibility’ to legitimise activities that often result in environmental damage and social disruption (Benson & Kirsch, 2010; Gilberthorpe & Banks, 2012).”