Understanding the implications of empirical work on corporate growth rates

By P. Geroski. 2005

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach (2008, background): “(see for example the discussion in Geroski (2000, 2005) or the theoretical model in Aghion”
Agency, structure, and the dominance of OEMs: Change and stability in the automotive sector (2016, background): “This is particularly puzzling, since Ng, Westgren, and Sonka (2009) have shown that visions of reality differ between parts of the value chain.”
The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms (2010, background): “3 Geroski (2005, p. 136) argues that Gibrat-type randomness is”
Advancing Firm Growth Research: A Focus on Growth Mode Instead of Growth Rate (2010, background): “Based on the empirical evidence, it is hard to challenge the notion that growth rates of firms are nearly random (Geroski, 2005).”
Firm Growth : a Survey (2007, unknown): “Economic theorizing also recognizes the centrality of innovation in growth of firm sales (see for example the discussion in Geroski (2000, 2005) or the theoretical model in Aghion and Howitt (1992)).”