What Does Explainable AI Really Mean? A New Conceptualization of Perspectives

By Derek Doran, Sarah Schulz, Tarek R. Besold. 2017

483 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We characterize three notions of explainable AI that cut across research fields: opaque systems that offer no insight into its algo- rithmic mechanisms; interpretable systems where users can mathemat- ically analyze its algorithmic mechanisms; and comprehensible systems that emit symbols enabling user-driven explanations of how a conclusion is reached. The paper is motivated by a corpus analysis of NIPS, ACL, COGSCI, and ICCV/ECCV paper titles showing differences in how work on explainable AI is positioned in various fields. We close by introducing a fourth notion: truly explainable systems, where automated reasoning is central to output crafted explanations without requiring human post processing as final step of the generative process.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Enrique Herrera-Viedma
  2. Longo Luca
  3. Giulia Vilone
  4. Francisco Herrera
  5. Max Bucher
  6. Constantinos S. Pattichis
  7. Douglas B. Kell
  8. Andreas Holzinger

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Max Bucher
  2. Andreas Holzinger
  3. Giulia Vilone
  4. Longo Luca
  5. Nadia Burkart
  6. Marco F. Huber
  7. Stéphane Herbin
  8. Chris Biemann

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Bertie Vidgen
  2. Stéphane Herbin
  3. Max Bucher
  4. Frédéric Jurie
  5. Longo Luca
  6. Giulia Vilone
  7. Nadia Burkart
  8. Marco F. Huber

Citations in the corpus