Science Parks in Japan and Their Value-Added Contributions to New Technology-Based Firms

By Nobuya Fukugawa. 2006

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a09d8d277f8215179e7282f9c18630d71099fb9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. M. Schwartz
2. Christoph Hornych
3. Andrés Barge-Gil
4. S. Pérez-Canto
5. A. Modrego
6. Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng
7. Alberto Albahari
8. Chia-Li Lin

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. M. Schwartz
2. Andrés Barge-Gil
3. Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng
4. Christoph Hornych
5. Chia-Li Lin
6. Mariagrazia Squicciarini
7. Frank J. van Rijnsoever
8. Johanna Vanderstraeten

In Strategy and Management

1. M. Schwartz
2. Andrés Barge-Gil
3. S. Pérez-Canto
4. A. Modrego
5. Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng
6. Alberto Albahari
7. Christoph Hornych
8. Chia-Li Lin

Citations in the corpus

• A control group study of incubators’ impact to promote firm survival (2010, background): “…Radosevic and Myrzakhmet (2009)) measures of the cooperation propensity, particularly with academic institution (Colombo and Delmastro (2002); Fukugawa (2006); Yang et al. (2009)) or firm growth measured in terms of employment, sales or profitability (Westhead and Storey (1994); Löfsten and…”
• Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: Empirical evidence from Germany (2010, background): “Though, studies using the control-group concept find that on-park firms exhibit a higher degree of cooperation propensity in innovation processes with higher education institutions than comparable firms located outside those facilities (Colombo and Delmastro, 2002; Lindelöf and Löfsten, 2004; Fukuga”
• Technology Parks versus Science Parks: does the university make the difference? (2013, background): “However, in most countries (e.g. the US (Link and Scott, 2007), Australia (Phillimore, 1999), China (Wright et al., 2008), Japan (Fukugawa, 2006), France (Chorda, 1996), Portugal (Ratinho and Henriques, 2010), Spain and Italy (Albahari et al., 2013a) the level of university involvement in national S”
• Specialization as strategy for business incubators: An assessment of the Central German Multimedia Center (2008, background): “Even though the level of interaction with academic institutions, particularly local universities, seems to be generally low, on-park firms exhibit a higher degree of cooperation propensity in innovation processes (Colombo and Delmastro, 2002; Lindelöf and Löfsten, 2004; Fukugawa, 2006).”
• Science and Technology Parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain (2016, background): “Previous academic research mostly analyses the effect of location in an STP on firms’ results and behaviour (Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2005; Fukugawa, 2006; Squicciarini, 2008).”
• Science Parks’ tenants versus out-of-Park firms: who innovates more? A duration model (2008, background): “A generally positive SP assessment is also offered by Fukugawa (2006) , who investigates the ability of in and out Japanese Parks’ NTBFs to establish links with HEIs.”
• A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL (2009, background): “Fukugawa (2006) considered that the major contribution of the science park was providing new technology-based firms (abbreviated NTBF) the linkage with local higher education institutes (HEIs) and research institutes, and also provided the service of incubation for the NTBF.”