The transatlantic divide: Why are American and British IPE so different?

By B. Cohen. 2007

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy (2017, background): “…the two main schools of IPE originally identified by Jerry Cohen – the ‘American’ school and the ‘British’ school – began to follow rather different paths (Cohen, 2007).15 In the late 1990s, the American school gradually evolved into ‘Open Economy Politics’ (OEP), and in doing so, it moved away…”
Open economy politics: A critical review (2009, background): “Atlantic divide in IPE, and especially Cohen (2007) , Phillips (2009), Wade (2009), and Katzenstein (2009).”
The old IPE and the new (2009, background): “…political economy) by Maliniak and Tierney, and Benjamin Cohen’s work on the transatlantic divide in the field – published in RIPE in 2007 and as part of his 2008 book (Cohen, 2007, 2008) – provide an appropriate occasion for reflection on the history of the IPE field and where it stands now.”
The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy (2011, methodology): “…domestic political relationships tested empirically with statistical methods is the approach most likely to generate such relatively certain knowledge+8 2+ See Cohen 2007 and 2008, for a mildly critical survey of the emergence and development of the American School of IPE+Maliniak and Tierney…”