The old IPE and the new

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy (2011, methodology): “…1976; and Gilpin 1981+ On regime theory and neoliberal institutionalism, see Krasner 1983; and Keohane 1984+ 4+ See Frieden and Martin 2002, 119; and Lake 2006+ 5+ Keohane 2009, 37–38+ 6+ Frieden and Lake 2005, 138+ 7+ Ibid+ 8+ Lake 2009a+ Although using statistical methods to test hypotheses…”
The Political Economy of Global Finance: A Network Model (2013, background): “7 On positive feedback in politics more generally, see Jervis (1997) and Pierson (2004).”
Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy (2017, unknown): “See also Keohane (2009).”
Open economy politics: A critical review (2009, background): “While there was lots of theoretical ferment—these were, indeed, intellectually heady years (see Keohane 2009)—there was little accumulation of knowledge across the field.”
Not your parents' trade politics: the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations (2016, background): “The emphasis in IPE has been to consider essentially only material interests (Katzenstein 2009: 127; Keohane 2009: 38; Lake 2009: 226).”