Microsatellite polymorphism in Pisum sativum

By J. Burstin, G. Deniot, J. Potier, C. Weinachter, G. Aubert, A. Baranger. 2001

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a037ad7d877fb60fe64a4265a2c470d388a911c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. Nigel Maxted
2. J. Kumar
3. R R Mir
4. Pankaj Kumar Gupta
5. Akhilesh K. Tyagi
6. C. Coyne
7. S. Rustgi
8. Rajeev K. Varshney

Citations in the corpus

• A preliminary genetic analysis of fibre traits and the use of new genomic SSRs for genetic diversity in jute (2008, result): “(Sethy et al. 2006; Burstin et al. 2001; Hüttel et al. 1999), but was comparable to the percentage (90.45”
• Phylogeny, phylogeography and genetic diversity of the Pisum genus (2010, background): “…have been popular for assessing Pisum diversity because of their high polymorphism and information content, co-dominance and reproducibility (Burstin et al., 2001; Ford et al., 2002; Baranger et al., 2004; Loridon et al., 2005; Ta’ran et al., 2005; Smýkal et al., 2008a; Zong et al., 2009;…”