Phylogeny, phylogeography and genetic diversity of the Pisum genus

By P. Smýkal, G. Kenicer, A. Flavell, Jukka Corander, O. Kosterin, Robert R Redden, R. Ford, C. Coyne, Nigel Maxted, M. Ambrose and 1 more. Plant genetic resources, 2010

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aad08286883a34df86f90fa42ad5f1f1a2d4ee42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. C. Toker
2. Diego Rubiales

In Plant Science

1. R. Saxena
2. M. Blair
3. Nigel Maxted
4. J. Berger
5. Rajeev K. Varshney
6. C. Coyne
7. C. Toker
8. M. Nelson

Citations in the corpus

• Legume Crops Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity for Science and Breeding (2015, background): “(Smýkal et al., 2011; Schaefer et al., 2012).”
• Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the Genomic Era (2012, methodology): “RBIP markers were chosen because of their scoring simplicity and the entire JIC dataset, the Czech National Pea Collection (CzNPC), and a selected core set of 117 accessions of Chinese origin from the ATFC collection were analyzed using a common set of 17 RBIP loci [12,17,25].”
• Potential and limits of exploitation of crop wild relatives for pea, lentil, and chickpea improvement (2020, background): “These separate expansions might explain the novel diversity of Afghan type and Chinese landrace peas (Smýkal et al., 2011; Zong et al., 2009) either through drift or through natural selection in diverse environments (Li, Redden, Zong, Berger, & Bennett, 2013).”