Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems

By E. Løken. 2007

701 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a02d79334f5c0b9866aa8cd5d4a2333854942836

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (2013, methodology): “…measurements and AHP is developed independently of other decision theories…The major characteristic of the AHP method is the use of pair-wise comparisons, which are used both to compare the alternatives with respect to the various criteria and to estimate criteria weights " (Loken, 2007, p. 1587).”
Electrification planning using Network Planner tool: The case of Ghana (2014, methodology): “Published by Elsevier In planners need tools to develop strategies for lowering the electrification cost in order tomeet the economic demand of the region (Loken, 2007).”
A literature-based multi-criteria evaluation of the EU ETS (2012, background): “For overviews on multi-criteria decision making for energy systems, see [19–21].”
ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications (2016, methodology): “Some issues discussed are whether or not there is a difference in the users’ perception of appropriateness or ease of use of a given method or the users’ expectation MCDA for sustainability assessment of urban water systems Water Review Lendaris (1980) Tools for structural modeling – Survey Lootsma ”
Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection (2009, methodology): “According to Løken [16], existing MCDA methods can be classified into three broad categories:”
Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (2015, methodology): “The preference models used by the MCDM methods can be divided into three categories [Løken 2007]: value measurement models that assign a numerical score to each solution, 3 goal, aspiration, and reference level models that prefer solutions closest to a determined goal or aspiration level, and…”
Generation expansion planning optimisation with renewable energy integration: A review (2017, methodology): “Besides, works related to energy planning models with multiple conflicting objectives were reviewed by Voropai and Ivanova [13], Pohekar and Ramachandran [14], Løken [15] and Wang et al. [16].”
Review of Alternative Methodologies for Analysing Off-Grid Electricity Supply (2012, background): “Loken [68] insisted that in choosing an appropriate MCDM approach, it is better to avoid “black-box” models as they are poorly understood by the decisionmakers.”
The inclusion of social aspects in power planning (2011, background): “abundant, and a detailed description of electricity planning with MCDA may be found for example in [39].”