The Nature of Intuition and Its Neglect in Research on Judgment and Decision Making
By T. Betsch. 2008
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a014fa6ad3c0b5f65efa3e0ebae9d56827256de4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- A. Glöckner
- Cilia Witteman
- Deborah DiazGranados
- Eduardo Salas
- M. Rosen
- Jonathan Evans
- S. Epstein
- T. Betsch
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- A. Glöckner
- Cilia Witteman
- Eduardo Salas
- M. Rosen
- Deborah DiazGranados
- Jonathan Evans
- S. Epstein
- T. Betsch
In General Decision Sciences
- A. Glöckner
- Cilia Witteman
- Eduardo Salas
- M. Rosen
- Deborah DiazGranados
- T. Betsch
- Jonathan Evans
- S. Epstein
Citations in the corpus
- Intuition and Reasoning: A Dual-Process Perspective (2010, background): “Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research”
- Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making: Extensive Thinking Without Effort (2010, methodology): “The stronger prior experience has been consolidated in memory, the more likely it will be activated by situational cues and, hence, feed input to intuition (Betsch, 2008).”
- Demystifying Intuition: What It Is, What It Does, and How It Does It (2010, background): “Several authors (e.g., Betsch, 2008; Epstein, 1973, 2003; Hogarth, 2001; Simon, 1992) regard experience as playing a vital role in intuitive processing.”
- A Video-Based Training Method for Improving Soccer Referees’ Intuitive Decision-Making Skills (2011, background): “Note that the concept of intuition as applied in this article does not share this view and understands heuristics rather as “shortcuts to deliberation “(Betsch, 2008, p. 9).”
- Expertise-Based Intuition and Decision Making in Organizations (2010, methodology): “…for Deliberation scales of the PID moderated the effect of implicit and explicit attitudes on decisions; for people with a preference for intuition, implicit attitudes predicted decisions, and for people with a preference for deliberation, explicit attitudes predicted decisions (Betsch, 2008a).”
- Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making (2010, methodology): “…1938b) and social perception (Bruner & Goodman, 1947; Read & Miller, 1998; Read, Vanman, & Miller, 1997) to structure information in our environment and to quickly form reasonable interpretations (Gestalten), which can constitute the basis for judgements and decisions (Glöckner & Betsch, 2008c).”