Indirect facilitation of an anuran invasion by non‐native fishes

By Michael J. Adams, C. Pearl, R. Bury. 2003

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fb103eb4708bf4b92ff16529ff1560f4d19405c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Understanding the establishment success of non-indigenous fishes: lessons from population genetics (2007, background): “These changes might also facilitate the establishment of other nonindigenous species causing further adverse effects (Ricciardi & Maclsaac, 2000; Adams et al., 2003).”
Designing Wetlands for Amphibians: The Importance of Predatory Fish and Shallow Littoral Zones in Structuring of Amphibian Communities (2005, background): “Some studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between the presence of predatory fish and American bullfrogs mediated through indirect effects of fish feeding on aquatic insects, thereby lessening the predation on bullfrog larvae (Smith et al. 1999; Adams et al. 2003).”
Problems and opportunities managing invasive Bullfrogs: is there any hope? (2007, background): “Research in the State of Oregon, USA, has shown that invasive bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque) increase the survival of Bullfrog tadpoles by reducing the abundance of indigenous aeshnid dragonfly larvae (Adams et al. 2003).”
The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. (2007, background): “…systems (Stachowicz 2001, Stachowicz and Byrnes 2006), and the invasional meltdown hypothesis (process 3) has received some empirical support, especially in aquatic systems (Ricciardi and MacIsaac 2000, Ricciardi 2001, Adams et al. 2003, O’Dowd et al. 2003, Floerl et al. 2004, Grosholz 2005).”
Competition and compensation among cattle, zebras, and elephants in a semi-arid savanna in Laikipia, Kenya (2005, background): “Exploitative competition is the most straightforward indirect effect, but more complex indirect effects are beginning to be revealed, such as indirect facilitation occurring in trophic cascades (cf., Adams et al., 2003 ).”
Impacts of Biological Invasions on Freshwater Ecosystems (2010, background): “The latter indirectly enhance survival of tadpoles by reducing densities of predatory macroinvertebrates (see Adams et al. 2003 ).”
Biological invasions in inland waters: an overview (2007, background): “Strong experimental evidence was provided by Adams et al. (2003), who showed that introduced fish facilitated invasion by the bullfrog (R. catesbeiana) in western North America by preying on native macroinvertebrates (such as dragonfly nymphs) that otherwise precluded establishment or severely…”
Introduced invertebrates are important prey for a generalist predator (2005, background): “Introduced predators or competitors can have large, potentially catastrophic effects on vertebrate populations (Adams et al ., 2003; Kats & Ferrer, 2003; Kiesecker, 2003), so attention is clearly warranted; however, the effects of introduced prey may also be important and are generally ignored.”
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species (2013, background): “Nevertheless, a diversity of underexploited approaches such as micro- and meso-cosm experiments (e.g., Adams et al. 2003, Maron and Marler 2008, Carey and Wahl 2010), computer simulations (e.g., Gonzalez et al. 2008, Powell et al. 2011), and comparative analyses across geographic regions could…”
Interactions of an introduced shrub and introduced earthworms in an Illinois urban woodland: impact on leaf litter decomposition. (2007, background): “Despite the value of single species studies there is a growing awareness of the potential for synergy between invaders, where one species facilitates the spread of another, typically unrelated, species (Simberloff and Von Holle, 1999; Adams et al., 2003; O’Dowd et al., 2003).”
Amphibians in the climate vise: loss and restoration of resilience of montane wetland ecosystems in the western US (2014, background): “For example, the presence of large salamanders or predatory dragonfly larvae may reduce larval survival of smaller amphibians, resulting in avoidance of such habitats for breeding and rearing by these species (Adams et al. 2003; Hoffman et al. 2003).”
Sub‐alpine amphibian distributions related to species palatability to non‐native salmonids in the Klamath mountains of northern California (2006, background): “Similarly, Adams et al. (2003) found that non-native fishes increased bullfrog tadpole survival by reducing predatory macroinvertebrate densities.”
Influences of Design and Landscape Placement Parameters on Amphibian Abundance in Constructed Wetlands (2010, background): “If current wetland trends continue, bullfrogs will gain additional breeding habitat and increased access to temporary natural wetlands, while other amphibians might suffer from increased predation, competition, and exposure to pathogens (Adams et al. 2003; Boone et al. 2008).”
Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future (2015, background): “While a variety of observational and experimental investigations have demonstrated facilitation between non-native species (Adams et al., 2003; Devin et al., 2003; Cucherousset et al., 2006; Chucholl, 2013; Michelan et al., 2014; Thiébaut & Martinez, 2015), the data are insufficient to show the…”
Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology (2006, background): “…in which the potential mechanism of an indirect Indirect effects in invasion biology © 2006 The Authors Diversity and Distributions, 12, 443–455, Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 451 effect is detected, but the impact remains untested (Lenz & Taylor, 2001; Adams et al., 2003).”
Asymmetrical Effects of Introduced Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) on Native Ranid Frogs in Oregon (2004, background): “For example, the aquatic habits of R. pretiosa may expose them asymmetrically to predation by nonnative fish that often coexist with R. catesbeiana (see Hayes and Jennings, 1986; Adams et al., 2003).”