Asymmetrical Effects of Introduced Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) on Native Ranid Frogs in Oregon

By C. Pearl, Michael J. Adams, R. Bury, Brome McCreary. Copeia, 2004

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f18b6481f23c6cc9d6a2d7b041dbcf955945cc7f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. C. Pearl
2. Michael J. Adams
3. L. Kats
4. A. Blaustein
5. P. Govindarajulu
6. B. Anholt

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Pearl
2. L. Kats
3. Michael J. Adams
4. A. Blaustein
5. Andrew Storfer
6. Andrew Sih
7. R. Bury
8. Gentile Francesco Ficetola

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Michael J. Adams
2. C. Pearl
3. L. Kats
4. A. Blaustein
5. P. Govindarajulu
6. B. Anholt

Citations in the corpus

• Problems and opportunities managing invasive Bullfrogs: is there any hope? (2007, background): “In particular, while Bullfrogs are a problem for a variety of indigenous species and there is also evidence that some otherwise vulnerable natives can sometimes coexist with Bullfrogs (Kiesecker and Blaustein 1997, Adams 1999, Govindarajulu 2004, Pearl et al. 2004).”
• Invasion Complexities: The Diverse Impacts of Nonnative Species on Amphibians (2014, background): “Although there are patterns where native amphibians and the presence of bullfrogs are negatively correlated, the underlying mechanisms of displacement of native amphibian species remains complex (Blaustein and Kiesecker, 2002; Kiesecker et al., 2001a; Pearl et al., 2004).”
• Introduced Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) in Western Canada: Has Their Ecology Diverged? (2006, background): “This potential for predation has been suggested as the primary reason for decline of native species following the establishment of introduced bullfrog populations (Hayes and Jennings, 1986; Pearl et al., 2004).”