Optimism and Physical Health: A Meta-analytic Review

By Heather N. Rasmussen, M. Scheier, J. Greenhouse. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2009

812 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundPrior research links optimism to physical health, but the strength of the association has not been systematically evaluated.PurposeThe purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analytic review to determine the strength of the association between optimism and physical health.MethodsThe findings from 83 studies, with 108 effect sizes (ESs), were included in the analyses, using random-effects models.ResultsOverall, the mean ES characterizing the relationship between optimism and physical health outcomes was 0.17, p < .001. ESs were larger for studies using subjective (versus objective) measures of physical health. Subsidiary analyses were also conducted grouping studies into those that focused solely on mortality, survival, cardiovascular outcomes, physiological markers (including immune function), immune function only, cancer outcomes, outcomes related to pregnancy, physical symptoms, or pain. In each case, optimism was a significant predictor of health outcomes or markers, all p < .001.ConclusionsOptimism is a significant predictor of positive physical health outcomes.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f8ad9a99a8fa9505b7affd0c2f83acdc01af3ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Louis Tay
  2. Nicola S. Schutte
  3. John M. Malouff
  4. J. De Neve
  5. E. Diener
  6. Linda C Gallo
  7. Karen A. Matthews
  8. N. Collins

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. J. De Neve
  2. Louis Tay
  3. Nicola S. Schutte
  4. John M. Malouff
  5. E. Diener

In Genetics

  1. E. Diener

Citations in the corpus