The Rise and Demise of the New Public Management

By Wolfgang Drechsler, Clay Shirky. 2005

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f618a65567d7eb1f327540bcca6f2552a42655b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Rainer Kattel
2. Mariana Mazzucato
3. J. Torfing
4. Eva Sørensen
5. A. Røiseland
6. Veiko Lember
7. G. Semieniuk
8. Josh Ryan‐Collins

Citations in the corpus

• PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AS AN INDUSTRIAL POLICY TOOL: AN OPTION FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES? (2010, background): “(See Drechsler, 2005) These are, however, similar values emphasized typically in the current procurement literature: cost effectiveness, transparency and enhanced”
• Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector (2018, background): “Importantly, concurrently with Ergas' analysis, most countries underwent massive public sector reforms, so-called new public management (NPM) reforms of the 1980s and 1990s (for an overview, see Drechsler 2005).”
• Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward (2019, background): “Many public administration scholars have already declared New Public Management dead and gone (Drechsler, 2005; Levy, 2010; Lynn, 1998) and there is no point in flogging a dead horse.”