Statistical Equity: A Fairness Classification Objective

By Ninareh Mehrabi, Yuzhong Huang, Fred Morstatter. 2020

10 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Machine learning systems have been shown to propagate the societal errors of the past. In light of this, a wealth of research focuses on designing solutions that are "fair." Even with this abundance of work, there is no singular definition of fairness, mainly because fairness is subjective and context dependent. We propose a new fairness definition, motivated by the principle of equity, that considers existing biases in the data and attempts to make equitable decisions that account for these previous historical biases. We formalize our definition of fairness, and motivate it with its appropriate contexts. Next, we operationalize it for equitable classification. We perform multiple automatic and human evaluations to show the effectiveness of our definition and demonstrate its utility for aspects of fairness, such as the feedback loop.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Safety Research, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Aram Galstyan
  2. Fred Morstatter
  3. Ninareh Mehrabi
  4. Greg Ver Steeg
  5. Nripsuta Ani Saxena
  6. Umang Gupta
  7. Kristina Lerman
  8. Bistra N. Dilkina

In Safety Research

  1. Aram Galstyan
  2. Fred Morstatter
  3. Ninareh Mehrabi
  4. Greg Ver Steeg
  5. Kristina Lerman
  6. Umang Gupta
  7. Nripsuta Ani Saxena

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

  1. Aram Galstyan
  2. Fred Morstatter
  3. Ninareh Mehrabi
  4. Kristina Lerman
  5. Nripsuta Ani Saxena

Citations in the corpus