Controllable Guarantees for Fair Outcomes via Contrastive Information Estimation

By Umang Gupta, Aaron Ferber, Bistra N. Dilkina, Greg Ver Steeg. 2021

80 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Controlling bias in training datasets is vital for ensuring equal treatment, or parity, between different groups in downstream applications. A naive solution is to transform the data so that it is statistically independent of group membership, but this may throw away too much information when a reasonable compromise between fairness and accuracy is desired. Another common approach is to limit the ability of a particular adversary who seeks to maximize parity. Unfortunately, representations produced by adversarial approaches may still retain biases as their efficacy is tied to the complexity of the adversary used during training. To this end, we theoretically establish that by limiting the mutual information between representations and protected attributes, we can assuredly control the parity of any downstream classifier. We demonstrate an effective method for controlling parity through mutual information based on contrastive information estimators and show that they outperform approaches that rely on variational bounds based on complex generative models. We test our approach on UCI Adult and Heritage Health datasets and demonstrate that our approach provides more informative representations across a range of desired parity thresholds while providing strong theoretical guarantees on the parity of any downstream algorithm.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Aram Galstyan
  2. Fred Morstatter
  3. Ninareh Mehrabi
  4. Lawrence Carin
  5. Zhe Gan
  6. Liqun Chen
  7. Shuyang Gao
  8. Greg Ver Steeg

In Genetics

  1. Lawrence Carin
  2. Greg Ver Steeg

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Zhe Gan
  2. Aram Galstyan
  3. Lawrence Carin
  4. Greg Ver Steeg
  5. Fred Morstatter
  6. Shuyang Gao
  7. Ninareh Mehrabi
  8. Chunyuan Li

Citations in the corpus