Neural mechanisms underlying sensory feedback control of speech
By Jason A. Tourville, Frank H. Guenther. 2007
408 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f4ba80fcb719912d973cff6da283cac465f377b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Cathy J. Price
- John D. E. Gabrieli
- Xavier Guell
- Tyler K. Perrachione
- Satrajit S. Ghosh
- Jeremy D. Schmahmann
- Peter Indefrey
- J. Perrachione
In Social Psychology
- John D. E. Gabrieli
- Xavier Guell
- Cathy J. Price
- Tyler K. Perrachione
- Jeremy D. Schmahmann
- Peter Indefrey
- J. Perrachione
- Friedemann Pulvermüller
Citations in the corpus
- Brains and brands: Developing mutually informative research in neuroscience and marketing (2008, background): “It has been hypothesized, for instance, that the speech condition stuttering might result from errors in feedback between speech perception (auditory) regions and speech production (motor) ones (Tourville et al., 2008).”
- A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012, background): “prefrontal cortex and rolandic cortical activity increasedwith bilateral superior temporal activation during distorted feedback (Tourville et al., 2008) which suggested a role for these areas in modulating subsequent speechoutput, or in resolving interference.”
- The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update (2011, methodology): “Finally new analysis techniques for measuring anatomical connections (diffusion tensor imaging, DTI) and modeling the interaction between brain areas (structural equation modeling, SEM; dynamic causal modeling, DCM, independent component analysis, ICA) have begun to be applied to word production (Sa”
- Functional gradients of the cerebellum (2018, background): “fMRI task activity analyses have made claims regarding distinct functional contributions of the cerebellar second motor representation (Habas et al., 2004; Diedrichsen et al., 2005; Habas and Cabanis, 2006; Bohland and Guenther, 2006; Tourville et al., 2008); however, none has demonstrated statistic”