The semantic Web and its languages

By Ora Lassila, Frank van Harmelen, Ian Horrocks, J. Hendler, Deborah L. McGuinness. 2000

400 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f142d9fb59e43bf7c065d65124565ec6a55b362

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology (2001, methodology): “The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), in conjunction with the W3C, is developing DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML) by extending RDF with more expressive constructs aimed at facilitating agent interaction on the Web ( Hendler and McGuinness 2000 ).”
The Semantic Grid: A Future e‐Science Infrastructure (2003, background): “Examples include SHOE [Luke00], DAML [ Hendler00 ], and OIL [vanHarmelen00].”
Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services (2002, methodology): “These include XML, RDF and RDF(S) and most recently DAML+OIL [13, 17 ,30].”
Creating Semantic Web Contents with Protégé-2000 (2001, methodology): “(2) Concepts that can be encoded as native Protege concepts (1) Concepts that are identical semantically ( 3 ) Concepts that do not have an equivalent in native Protege (4) Concepts in Protege that do not have an equivalent in the language”
OilEd: a Reason-able Ontology Editor for the Semantic Web (2001, methodology): “A similar RDFS based web ontology language called DAML has been developed as part of the DARPA DAML project [ 7 ].”
Promptdiff: a fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions (2002, background): “To address the first issue, researchers are actively developing representation formalisms, such as RDF and RDF Schema (W3C 2000), OIL (Fensel et al. 2000), DAML+OIL ( Hendler & McGuinness 2000 ), and so on. The work we are presenting in this paper addresses the second issue: structure-based comparis”
From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language (2003, methodology): “In 1999 the DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML) program3 was initiated with the aim of providing the foundations of a next generation “semantic” Web [ 19 ].”
Adapting Golog for Composition of Semantic Web Services (2002, background): “DAML+OIL, a description-logic based Semantic Web markup language, is one such language [ 10 , 11].”
Ontology Evolution: Not the Same as Schema Evolution (2004, neutral): “If an ontology language based on Description Logics (DL) is used to represent the ontology (e.g., OIL (Fensel et al. 2000) and DAML+OIL (www.daml.org/language; Hendler and McGuinness 2000 )), then we can use DL reasoners to re-classify changed concepts based on their new definitions.”
Combining answer set programming with description logics for the Semantic Web (2004, methodology): “OWL has three increasingly expressive sublanguages, namely OWL Lite, OWL DL, and OWL Full, where OWL DL basically corresponds to DAML+OIL (Horrocks 2002a; 2002b), which merges DAML ( Hendler & McGuiness 2000 ) and OIL (Fensel et al. 2001).”