On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators

By Alberto Abadie, Guido W. Imbens. 2006

1,043 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Matching estimators are widely used in empirical economics for the evaluation of programs or treatments. Researchers using matching methods often apply the bootstrap to calculate the standard errors. However, no formal justification has been provided for the use of the bootstrap in this setting. In this article, we show that the standard bootstrap is, in general, not valid for matching estimators, even in the simple case with a single continuous covariate where the estimator is root-N consistent and asymptotically normally distributed with zero asymptotic bias. Valid inferential methods in this setting are the analytic asymptotic variance estimator of Abadie and Imbens (2006a) as well as certain modifications of the standard bootstrap, like the subsampling methods in Politis and Romano (1994).

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/839451790ab91c36043c48bbe41e61061a175079

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Marco Caliendo
  2. M. D. Cattaneo
  3. M. Lechner
  4. Conny Wunsch
  5. Sabine Kopeinig
  6. Guido W. Imbens
  7. Jeronimo Carballo
  8. Christian Volpe Martincus

In Statistics and Probability

  1. M. Lechner
  2. Marco Caliendo
  3. M. D. Cattaneo
  4. Guido W. Imbens
  5. Martin Huber
  6. Kosuke Imai
  7. Alberto Abadie
  8. Conny Wunsch

Citations in the corpus