Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election

By S. Jessee. American Political Science Review, 2009

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ecea10a88181bca23ce1ebc3614046e19f41bab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Richard Bonneau
2. John T. Jost
3. Jonathan Nagler
4. Pablo Barberá
5. Joshua A. Tucker
6. S. van der Linden

In Political Science and International Relations

1. John T. Jost
2. Jonathan Nagler
3. Pablo Barberá
4. Joshua A. Tucker
5. Jonathan Michael Kropko
6. L. Ezrow
7. Mark A. Kayser
8. Michael Peress

Citations in the corpus

• Tweeting From Left to Right (2015, result): “Our approach is also similar in nature to other measurement methods that rely on spatial voting assumptions (Enelow and Hinich, 1984; Poole and Rosenthal, 1997; Jessee, 2009; Bonica, 2013a).”