Non‐lethal effects of predation in birds

By W. Cresswell. 2008

359 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9eb15d804f4e746e0f45faf27931b64c333dfd27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation (2009, background): “…help forge a link between flexible reproductive decision-making and studies of avian population and community ecology (e.g. Schmidt, 2006; see also Cresswell, 2008), much as studies of anti-predator decision-making have provided insight into population and community ecology in general (Lima,…”
Intraguild predation in raptor assemblages: A review (2008, background): “Therefore, the existence of even incidental predation between raptors may mean that there is a profound effect on the behaviour, population dynamics and community structure mediated through non-lethal effects (reviewed in Cresswell 2008).”
Increased perception of predation risk to adults and offspring alters avian reproductive strategy and performance (2014, background): “Our findings add to the increasing body of evidence demonstrating that prey can respond to predation risk phenotypically with plastic traits on short temporal scales (e.g., Schmitz et al. 1997; reviewed in Lima 1998a; Agrawal 2001; Creel and Christianson 2008; Cresswell 2008).”
Predation in bird populations (2011, background): “There are hundreds of case studies, and several reviews of these, that show that predators exert significant non-lethal population effects on their prey (Cresswell 2008).”
Antipredator calls of tufted titmice and interspecific transfer of encoded threat information (2012, background): “Whereas direct attack obviously reduces individual fitness, nonlethal predation threats can reduce prey fitness in a variety of ways (Lima and Dill 1990; Lima 1998; Creel and Christianson 2008), including restriction of access to resources as a result of fear-based alteration of use of space (Dolby ”
Predator lethality, optimal escape behavior, and autotomy (2010, background): “Indirect nonlethal effects of contact, such as behavioral compensation and vigilance, that impact prey fitness after encounters with predators (Lima and Dill 1990; Lima 1998; Cresswell 2008) are not modeled.”
Do bears know they are being hunted (2012, background): “The levels of antipredation behavior in response to a given level of predation risk can change in ecological time (Ydenberg and Dill, 1986), but also over evolutionary time (Cresswell, 2008).”
Fearing the feline: domestic cats reduce avian fecundity through trait-mediated indirect effects that increase nest predation by other species (2013, background): “Avian perception of predation risk can remain high even when predators are absent due to previous exposure (Cresswell 2008, 2011), and we find no evidence that parental provisioning rates return to normal even when the domestic cat model had been removed for a considerable period of time.”
Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives (2015, background): “Furthermore, development of a more general predation framework has provided important new research challenges regarding nest predation, such as quantifying the magnitude of non-consumptive effects (the ecology of fear: Lima 1998; Cresswell 2008; Zanette et al. 2011).”