Taxation of multiple greenhouse gases and the effects on income distribution: A case study of the Netherlands

By Annemarie C. Kerkhofa, Henri C. Molla, Eric Drissenb, Harry C. Wiltingb. 2008

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Who Pays a Price on Carbon? (2009, background): “Other studies taking a similar approach include Shammin and Bullard (2009) for the US, and a number of non-US applications, Kerkhof et al. (2008), Wier et al. (2005) and Labandeira and Labeaga (1999). estimate the incidence of those abatement activities and how the government uses or refunds the…”
Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households (2010, background): “Suffice to say that possible avenues to achieve this include personal carbon trading or carbon taxation (Kerkhof et al. 2008; Weber and Matthews 2008; Bird and Lockwood 2009; White and Thumin 2009; Bristow et al. 2010; Cohen 2010; Feng et al. 2010).”
Relating the environmental impact of consumption to household expenditures: An input–output analysis (2009, methodology): “low-income households may experience a relatively higher burden than high-income households (see also Kerkhof et al., 2008 ).”
Distributional effects of carbon taxation (2016, background): “Although several studies show that taxing carbon in certain developed countries/regions might be neutral (e.g., New Zealand [59], Italy [60]) or weakly progressive (e.g., Italy [61], SRB in US [37], Australia [23]), more studies show that the carbon tax in developed countries is regressive (e.g., De”