Relating the environmental impact of consumption to household expenditures: An input–output analysis

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Would shorter working time reduce greenhouse gas emissions? An analysis of time use and consumption in Swedish households (2015, result): “The resulting elasticities as well as the overall fit of the model are similar to findings from previous studies on household consumption in other countries (Kerkhof et al, 2009; Lenzen et al, 2006; Roca and Serrano, 2007).”
One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour–Impact Gap Problem (2012, methodology): “Kerkhof et al. (2009) came up with a novel approach in their analysis of household expenditures in the Netherlands; they were the first to make a consistent analysis of expenditure elasticity in four impact categories.”
Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption (2016, methodology): “Finally, by applying the concept of expenditure elasticity, we are able to evaluate changes in the environmental footprints resulting from changes in household expenditure (Baiocchi et al. 2010; Kerkhof et al. 2009; Weber and Matthews 2008).”
The Impacts of Household Consumption and Options for Change (2010, unknown): “In general, luxury goods generate smaller additional impacts per monetary unit in comparison with goods designed to meet basic needs, although it is clear that CO2 emissions expand in absolute terms with increasing income (Druckman and Jackson 2008; Weber and Matthews 2008b; Kerkhof et al. 2009).”