The role of reinforcement in speciation: Theory and data
By M. Servedio, Mohamed A. F. Noor. 2003
949 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e6ea72e978d4c220dc4b5fad887bc2e3e42e874
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
- P. Nosil
- K. Matsubayashi
- I. Ohshima
- A. Hoffmann
- J. Bridle
- J. Mckinnon
- Takehiko I. Hayashi
- G. E. Hill
Citations in the corpus
- The Park Grass Experiment 1856–2006: its contribution to ecology (2006, background): “Few, if any, incontrovertible examples from the field are known (Servedio & Noor 2003).”
- REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION CAUSED BY NATURAL SELECTION AGAINST IMMIGRANTS FROM DIVERGENT HABITATS (2005, background): “Furthermore, because habitat preferences are unlikely to evolve in the absence of local adaptation (Rice and Hostert 1993), it could be argued that the demonstration of divergent habitat preferences itself constitutes indirect evidence for immigrant inviability.”
- Cryptic species in Iphisa elegans Gray, 1851 (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae) revealed by hemipenial morphology and molecular data (2012, background): “According to Servedio & Noor (2003), if two populations have diverged to such an extent that they produce unfit hybrids, one must expect that more successful offspring will result from individuals belonging to the same population; therefore, those characters increasing assortative mating will be…”
- Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation? (2008, background): “…the inversion (or incompatibilities associated with it) causes some degree of postzygotic isolation, then selection may favor alleles that increase the strength of prezygotic reproductive barriers (i.e., reinforcement), but only where populations are in contact (Butlin 2005, Servedio & Noor 2003).”
- Associations between floral specialization and species diversity: cause, effect, or correlation? (2008, background): “However, over the subsequent decades the concept has passed out of favour (Butlin 1989; Rice and Hostert 1993), and then back in (Noor 1999; Servedio and Noor 2003), based on theoretical issues.”
- Linking color polymorphism maintenance and speciation. (2007, background): “The effect of gene flow on the evolution of reproductive isolation remains controversial, but theoretical analyses increasingly support the plausibility of reinforcement, in which matings between incipient species promote the evolution of reproductive isolation [ 27 ].”
- Profiles of cuticular hydrocarbons mediate male mate choice and sexual isolation between hybridising Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) (2007, background): “2005a), selection should reinforce the evolution of sexual isolation in the hybrid zone (Howard 1993; Servedio and Noor 2003).”
- Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? (2007, background): “This process is known as reinforcement [ 77 ].”
- Speciation and Sexual Conflict (2005, background): “result of selection against hybrids being produced after a secondary contact of two allopatric populations (e.g., Dobzhansky, 1940; Butlin, 1987; Howard, 1993; Servedio and Noor, 2003).”
- The roles and interactions of reproductive isolation mechanisms in fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) host strains (2010, background): “…of post-mating isolation may be intrinsic if, for example, behavioural dysfunctions render hybrids incapable of courtship, or extrinsic if, for example, intermediate courtship phenotypes render hybrids unattractive to members of the parental populations (Servedio & Noor, 2003; Coyne & Orr, 2004).”
- The mitonuclear compatibility species concept (2017, background): “Birds are typically diurnal and conspicuous, so ornithologists had recorded the phenotypes (particularly coloration and song) as well as the distributions of the great majority of the world’s bird populations by the early twentieth century (Sharpe 1909, Mayr 1970).”