The r-Process in Neutrino-driven Winds from Nascent, “Compact” Neutron Stars of Core-Collapse Supernovae

By S. Wanajo, Toshitaka Kajino, G. Mathews, K. Otsuki. 2001

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present calculations of r-process nucleosynthesis in neutrino-driven winds from the nascent neutron stars of core-collapse supernovae. A full dynamical reaction network for both the α-rich freezeout and the subsequent r-process is employed. The physical properties of the neutrino-heated ejecta are deduced from a general relativistic model in which spherical symmetry and steady flow are assumed. Our results suggest that proto-neutron stars with a large compaction ratio provide the most robust physical conditions for the r-process. The third peak of the r-process is well reproduced in the winds from these "compact" proto-neutron stars even for a moderate entropy, ~ 100NAk-200NAk, and a neutrino luminosity as high as ~1052 ergs s-1. This is due to the short dynamical timescale of material in the wind. As a result, the overproduction of nuclei with A ≲ 120 is diminished (although some overproduction of nuclei with A ≈ 90 is still evident). The abundances of the r-process elements per event is significantly higher than in previous studies. The total integrated nucleosynthesis yields are in good agreement with the solar r-process abundance pattern. Our results have confirmed that the neutrino-driven wind scenario is still a promising site in which to form the solar r-process abundances. However, our best results seem to imply both a rather soft neutron-star equation of state and a massive proto-neutron star that is difficult to achieve with standard core-collapse models. We propose that the most favorable conditions perhaps require that a massive supernova progenitor forms a massive proto-neutron star by accretion after a failed initial neutrino burst.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e31d993f1c509193f082a80b2b73d76f8f53130

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Hans-Thomas Janka
  2. Friedrich-Karl Thielemann
  3. Bernhard Müller
  4. A. Arcones
  5. Stan Woosley
  6. Stephan Rosswog
  7. Alexander Heger
  8. Adam Burrows

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Hans-Thomas Janka
  2. Friedrich-Karl Thielemann
  3. Bernhard Müller
  4. A. Arcones
  5. Alexander Heger
  6. Stephan Rosswog
  7. Oleg Korobkin
  8. G. Mart'inez-Pinedo

Citations in the corpus