Neutron star mergers versus core-collapse supernovae as dominant r-process sites in the early Galaxy

By D. Argast, M. Samland, F. Thielemann, Y.-Z. Qian. 2003

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The astrophysical nature of r-process sites is a long-standing mystery and many probable sources have been suggested, among them lower-mass core-collapse supernovae (in the range 8–$10 \, {M}_{\odot}$), higher-mass core-collapse supernovae (with masses $\ge $20 ${M}_{\odot}$) and neutron star mergers. In this work, we present a detailed inhomogeneous chemical evolution study that considers for the first time neutron star mergers as major r-process sources, and compare this scenario to the ones in which core-collapse supernovae act as dominant r-process sites. We conclude that, due to the lack of reliable iron and r-process yields as a function of progenitor mass, it is not possible at present to distinguish between the lower-mass and higher-mass supernovae scenarios within the framework of inhomogeneous chemical evolution. However, neutron-star mergers seem to be ruled out as the dominant r-process source, since their low rates of occurrence would lead to r-process enrichment that is not consistent with observations at very low metallicities. Additionally, the considerable injection of r-process material by a single neutron-star merger leads to a scatter in [r-process/Fe] ratios at later times which is much too large compared to observations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29b1506028ae82ad55e79d15ba260aa863b76adc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. B. Metzger
  2. E. Quataert
  3. Stephan Rosswog
  4. R. Fern'andez
  5. D. Kasen
  6. David Radice
  7. Hans-Thomas Janka
  8. Albino Perego

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. B. Metzger
  2. Hans-Thomas Janka
  3. Stephan Rosswog
  4. Friedrich-Karl Thielemann
  5. E. Quataert
  6. Bernhard Müller
  7. Stan Woosley
  8. Oleg Korobkin

Citations in the corpus