Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies
By Pete Smith. Global Change Biology, 2016
788 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cd728083f47ddf99de43dafff71087a91be1689
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Chemistry
In Global and Planetary Change
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Enhancement of maize plant growth with inoculation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and biochar amendment in soil (2017, background): “…Changxun et al. 2016), soil quality improvement (Fang et al. 2016), biochemical property enhancement to facilitate soil biota (Puga et al. 2015; Hairani et al. 2016), mitigation of climate change effects in a long run (Smith 2016), and disposal of large-scale waste biomass (Jeffery et al. 2015).”
- Environmental application of biochar: Current status and perspectives. (2017, background): “GHGs, e.g., CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O are primarily released to the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation and degradation of soils, hence potentially contributing to climate change (Smith, 2016).”
- Young People's Burden: Requirement of Negative CO2 Emissions (2016, neutral): “Urgency of initiating emissions reductions is well recognized ◦ 2 removal, but recent studies (Smith et al., 2016; Williamson, Figure 1.”
- How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal (2019, background): “…management practices can restore some at least some of this lost carbon (Lal et al., 2018), so it has been suggested that soil C sequestration could be a significant greenhouse gas (GHG) removal strategy (also called negative emission technol‐ ogy, or carbon dioxide removal option; Smith, 2016).”
- Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, background): “Global potentials have been estimated (Paustian et al 2016, Smith 2016).”
- Fast growing research on negative emissions (2017, background): “The Royal Society 2009, Vaughan and Lenton 2011, McLaren 2012, Smith 2016, Smith et al 2016): some are currently hugely expensive while others require large amounts of land and may involve potentially large risks to food security or biodiversity.”
- Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage (2018, background): “However, the calculated NET potential of 0.7 Gt Ceq/year (Smith, 2016) would, even when doubled SCHMIDT ET AL.”
- Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, methodology): “…Lal 2003b, 2003a, 2004a, 2004c, 2004b, 2010, 2011, 2013, Lassaletta and Aguilera 2015, Lorenz and Lal 2014, Powlson et al 2014, Salati et al 2010, Smith 2012, 2016, Sommer and Bossio 2014, Minasny et al 2017, Metting et al 2001, Smith et al 2008) that included global technical potentials for…”
- Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? (2017, background): “Given the significant potential of SOC sequestration for climate change mitigation and as it is one of the few operational negative emission technology available today, the economic potential should be further explored (Fuss et al 2016, Smith 2016).”
- Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers (2019, background): “…aquifer depletion, soil degradation, increases in greenhouse gas emissions, declines in pollinator abundance and diversity, as well as negative impacts on off-farm ecosystem and human health (Schindler et al., 2016; Dalin et al., 2017; Smith, 2016; Ramankutty et al., 2018; Goulson et al., 2015).”