Prediction of violence using the HCR-20: a prospective study in two maximum-security correctional institutions

By H. Belfrage, Ran Fransson, S. Strand. 2000

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction (2015, methodology): “Applications of these tools can be seen in evidence-based sentencing (Hoffman 1994), correction / prison administration (Belfrage et al. 2000), informing release on parole (Pew Center of the States, Public Safety Performance Project 2011), determining the level of supervision during parole (Barnes…”
Predicting disciplinary adjustment in inmates undergoing forensic evaluation: a direct comparison of the PCL-R and the PAI (2003, result): “Moreover, mirroring relationships observed in studies from Sweden (Belfrage et al., 2000) and Canada (Ross et al., 1998), Factor 2 of the PCL-R was a stronger predictor of future disciplinary adjustment than Factor 1.”
Comparative Validity Analysis of Multiple Measures of Violence Risk in a Sample of Criminal Offenders (2005, methodology): “The PCL:SV, as with the PCL-R, has been shown to predict violence (Belfrage et al., 2000; Cornell et al., 1996; Douglas et al., 1999; Monahan et al., 2001; Skeem & Mulvey, 2001).”
The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. (2010, background): “…on static factors for risk assessment has been criticized because these factors do not reflect the complexity of individual functioning and cannot measure changes in risk over time or identify areas for intervention (Andrews et al., 1990; Campbell, French, & Gendreau, 2009; Wong & Gordon, 2006).”