Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony☆

By Akira Utsumi. 2000

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d737fa288fe867eba7bfd7d2cd586df55d232be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Penny M. Pexman
2. Albert N. Katz
3. John D. Campbell
4. R. Giora
5. Meghan Zvaigzne
6. Melanie Harris
7. Ofer Fein
8. Ari Rappoport

In Language and Linguistics

1. Albert N. Katz
2. John D. Campbell
3. Melanie Harris
4. Meghan Zvaigzne
5. Ofer Fein
6. R. Giora
7. Ari Rappoport
8. Aniruddha Ghosh

In Philosophy

1. Penny M. Pexman
2. John D. Campbell
3. Meghan Zvaigzne
4. R. Giora
5. Melanie Harris
6. Ari Rappoport
7. Aniruddha Ghosh
8. Maite Taboada

Citations in the corpus

• Lexical Influences on the Perception of Sarcasm (2007, background): “Following Kreuz and Roberts (1995) and Utsumi (2000), the judges identified the use of adjectives or adverbs in the bold-faced segments of each excerpt.”
• Expecting Irony: Context Versus Salience-Based Effects (2007, result): “Note that our earlier results were criticized for employing weak contexts, which, as a result, did not have speedy facilitative effects ( Ivanko & Pexman, 2003 ; Utsumi, 2000 ).”
• Semi-Supervised Recognition of Sarcasm in Twitter and Amazon (2010, background): “Utsumi (1996; 2000) introduces the implicit display theory, a cognitive computational framework that models the ironic environment .”
• Fracking Sarcasm using Neural Network (2016, background): “Sarcasm detection, despite being a well-studied phenomenon in cognitive science and linguistics (Gibbs and Clark, 1992; gib, 2007; Kreuz and Glucksberg, 1989; Utsumi, 2000), is still at its infancy as a computational task.”
• How Stereotypes Are Shared Through Language: A Review and Introduction of the Social Categories and Stereotypes Communication (SCSC) Framework (2019, background): “The literal meaning of ironic comments is inappropriate for the context, and thereby (ironically) refers to some relevant information, like implicit (stereotypic) expectancies (e.g., Attardo, 2000; Utsumi, 2000; Wilson & Sperber, 2004).”
• Are There Necessary Conditions for Inducing a Sense of Sarcastic Irony? (2012, background): “A more recent theoretical approach, implicit display theory (Utsumi, 2000), provides an additional contextual constraint.”
• Children's Perceptions of the Social Functions of Verbal Irony (2003, background): “These include the Echoic theories (Kreuz & Glucksberg, 1989; Sperber & Wilson, 1981, 1986), Pretense (e.g., Clark & Gerrig, 1984), and Allusional Pretense theories (Kumon-Nakamura et al., 1995), the Graded Salience Hypothesis (e.g., Giora, 1997), Implicit Display Theory ( Utsumi, 2000 ), and Colston”
• Sentiment Analysis: An Overview from Linguistics (2016, positive): “Irony, however, draws upon a much more varied pool of resources than just a few surface indicators and is sometimes even difficult to detect by humans (Utsumi 2000).”
• ICWSM - A Great Catchy Name: Semi-Supervised Recognition of Sarcastic Sentences in Online Product Reviews (2010, background): “Utsumi (1996; 2000) introduces the implicit display theory, a cognitive computational framework that models the ironic environment.”
• Does Irony Go Better With Friends? (2004, background): “Many irony researchers now advocate for a theory of irony by which various contextual and linguistic factors can act as constraints on the processing and comprehension of verbal irony (e.g., Colston, 2002; Ivanko & Pexman, 2003; Katz, 1996; Utsumi, 2000).”