Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence

By R. Waller, S. Gilbody. Psychological Medicine, 2008

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies (2011, neutral): “Recent studies have begun to address this through the exploration of the relationship between program exposure and outcomes [27-30].”
Computer-Delivered and Web-Based Interventions to Improve Depression, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being of University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2014, background): “Participant dropouts were reported in 12 studies; attrition is common in these types of intervention trials [65,66].”
Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression: Systematic Review (2009, background): “Very few studies formally examined reasons for dropout, and it was noted that personal circumstances “played a major role, including travel (for those studies based around a clinic computer)” (see Waller and Gilbody [53], page 3).”
Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012, background): “Secondly, dropout is a continued cause of concern, with only just over half completing all sessions (Waller & Gilbody, 2009).”
Attitudes Towards Internet Interventions Among Psychotherapists and Individuals with Mild to Moderate Depression Symptoms (2017, background): “Furthermore, psychotherapists’ lack of knowledge concerning cCBT correlated with their reduced acceptance of such programs (Waller and Gilbody 2009).”